Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, M. Grams., Smurda, J., Davies, M. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Advancement and you will Human Behavior, 29(2), 119�126.
Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Meters. (2000). The place out of attachment for the peoples mating. Summary of General Mindset, 4(2), 186�204.
Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, An excellent. (2002). Websites paradox reviewed. Journal off Personal Affairs, 58(1), 49�74.
Kraut, Roentgen., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet sites paradox: A personal technology you to definitely minimizes societal engagement and emotional really-getting? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017�1031.
The great benefits of confident illusions: Idealization additionally the construction regarding satisfaction for the romantic relationships
Kreider, Roentgen.Meters., & Industries, J. M. (2001). Number, time, and you will lifetime of marriages and you can divorces. Most recent Inhabitants Records, 70-80, (Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2005).
Lemieux, Roentgen., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional research of closeness, hobbies, and you can commitment: Review this new assumptions of the triangular concept away from love. Emotional Reports, 90(step three,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.ninety.step three https://besthookupwebsites.org/mexican-dating-sites/.1009-1014
Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Elizabeth. (2004). Impression most useful on the carrying out even worse: Public contrasting contained in this intimate dating. Log from Identification and you can Personal Mindset, 87(1), 80�95.
Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Diary off Personality and you can Personal Psychology, 97(1), 74�87.
Intrasexual vigilance: The newest implicit knowledge off personal competition
Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, G. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you attractive options: The brand new progressed psychology regarding relationships fix. Advancement and you may Individual Behavior, 29(5), 343�349.
pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential data from dispute and you may agreement inside distressed and nondistressed marital couples. Journal out-of Consulting and Health-related Psychology, 49(4), 554�567.
McKenna, K. Y. A good., Environmentally friendly, A beneficial. S., Gleason, Meters. J. (2002). Relationships creation online: What’s the huge destination? Diary regarding Societal Products, 58(1), 9�30.
Neff, L. A great., & Karney, B. R. (2002). Self-review intentions for the close dating: A type of in the world enhancement and you may particular confirmation. In the P. Noller & J. A good. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents throughout the study of couple telecommunications (pp. 32�58). Ny, NY: Cambridge School Press.
Obegi, J. H. (2008). The introduction of the customer-counselor bond from the contact out-of accessory principle. Psychotherapy: Principle, Research, Practice, Knowledge, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330
Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). The fresh personal overseeing program: Enhanced susceptibility so you can societal cues while the an adaptive reaction to public exception. For the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), The newest societal outcast: Ostracism, public difference, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213�226). Nyc, NY: Mindset Drive.
Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Age. (2001). In the world and specific relational patterns in the contact with public interactions. Record from Identity and Societal Mindset, 80(4), 613�631.
Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A good., Tran, S., ). Accessory and recommendations trying for the personal relationship. Personality and you will Personal Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422�438.
Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you can certain accessory representations within the adulthood: Could there be a romance?. Journal Of Personal And personal Dating, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001
Rusbult, C. Elizabeth., Olsen, Letter., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. A. (2001)mitment and you may dating repair elements. For the J. Harvey & A beneficial. Wenzel (Eds.), Personal close dating: Repairs and improvement (pp. 87�113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A good. D. (2000). Projection really feeling among spouses because a purpose of brand new resemblance within mutual event. Character And you can Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008
Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1980). Ramifications of salience away from extrinsic rewards for the preference and you will enjoying. Journal from Personality and Personal Therapy, 38(3), 453�460.
